Posts

Roxanne’s Curriculum – Unschooling Extremely

Roxanne identifies their schooling as extreme unschooling.

 Yeah, what else can I tell ya? We unschool – extremely…I don’t plan things for them to do or try to push them too hard in any direction.

Unschooling, by most definitions, would not include a structured curriculum, or even an unstructured one. Roxanne’s strategy of not planning things for her boys or even pushing them towards something she thinks is important reflects an unschooling philosophy. She’s not building a curriculum of things that are important to her and adjusting it for her children’s interests like many other homeschoolers.

Roxanne has both shared her distrust of the educational authorities in Harrisburg and she has explained why she and her boys believe that most textbooks are outdated before they are even published. Roxanne reports Luke saying,

People who are often writing textbooks don’t know the subject they are writing about. They are basically anybody with a college degree, gets hired on a temporary basis to put this stuff together, they may or may not have any clue about the subject, and that’s how textbooks get so stupid. The thing too though, is he also knows that anything that has been printed out is already old news…If you’ve had time to make a textbook on it, it’s too late man, unless it’s on Ancient Rome.

Such beliefs could fuel an approach to learning that discards both textbooks and learning strategies such as Common Core. Therefore, the carefully arranged and balanced curricula used by schools would find no place in an unschooling home. Roxanne’s home is like that. Below she describes different ways that her boys learn.

First of all, when John comes home for dinner the question “What did you learn at school today?” is never asked. Instead Roxanne reports far-ranging conversations that astonish her. She is usually surprised at the things her sons are interested in and have learned.

There’s constant conversation instigated by the kids about everything from world politics, the history of Rome, the Mormon faith. I mean they stun me with the vast amounts of things that interest them and how they pick it up and remember huge amounts of information and can verbally dance circles around anybody.

She explains how their learning is like following threads of information. She tells a story about how Luke learns about foxes,

They’ll read a story about foxes. Luke will start looking into more about foxes, more about domesticating foxes, how they domesticate foxes, why they domesticate foxes, what are the problems with it, what could be the benefits. Then that might make him look up another animal that was bred to become different than it was…  So, it’s like this “following threads” that take them all over the place.

 Another way their threads work is Everett wanted to read Dracula because he could tell that a lot of things he had seen were spoofs of Dracula, so he felt that everything would be better if he understood Dracula. So, he read Dracula. And then he read Frankenstein, cause he’s like well obviously you gotta read Frankenstein or you’re not gonna get it. So, the things that motivate them take them to places that I wouldn’t expect.

One of their computers broke and when it was taken to be repaired Everett paid close attention.

Our computer broke. We went to the computer store…Everything the guy did to try and retrieve the data, Everett was watching and saying, what does that keystroke do? What does that key stroke do? What are you doing now? Do you mind if I ask you everything you’re doing…and the next morning Everett said, Well I stayed up till about four or five and I really looked, and I found about 10 ways we might have been able to retrieve the data, but I don’t think any of them are going to work in this situation?

 Roxanne believes when you don’t have to get up and go to school every morning and you’re not bogged down with learning things, like a language, that you will never use, that you can specialize and become good at things you are interested in.

 Video games are also important vehicles for learning.

I would say as far as what we actually use, video games are one or our most important ways of learning, and ways of expressing what they learn. An example being the game Civilization.

 Adopting an unschooling approach to learning fosters different attitudes and behaviors. Many homeschoolers set up their learning experiences in ways similar to school. They begin school at a certain time, walk through lessons prescribed by bought curriculums or home built ones, and end school at a certain time. The closer one adheres to an unschooling approach the difference seen between schooling and life diminishes; the accepted philosophy becomes that children learn all the time. Roxanne explains how she reports the ‘’days her kids have gone to school.”

Once a year, I have to turn in a portfolio, that has a calendar that shows they went to school a hundred and eighty days…which is malarkey. So, I look at the school calendar and x off all the days they would have gone to school. There is no on or off for us. They are always learning.

 My experiences homeschooling led me to much the conclusion that Roxanne arrived at. Children start off so curious and are such good learners when following their nose. I love the idea of life-long learners, and that we can learn about all kinds of things all the time. These ideas came to me as an adult and fed not only my thoughts and ideas about my children’s learning, but my own behaviors as an adult and my attitudes towards learning.

Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

Isabel’s Curriculum: Structured yet Informal

Money is often a concern in schooling. Public schooling is probably the cheapest. Private school is expensive. Homeschooling costs vary widely. One can spend money on a curriculum, textbooks, books, technological devices, classes, projects, field trips, and much more. Isabel believes that public schools should be excellent, and that they aren’t. She admired Waldorf educational approaches. In the beginning she would probably have chosen a private school over homeschooling if she could have afforded it. However, after homeschooling for a while she may have changed her mind.

Isabel doesn’t buy a curriculum and has used very few textbooks or structured materials. However, she does take advantage of some curricular frameworks.

 J: Do you have a curriculum you buy?

I: Nope

 I: …I do objectives that have a lot to do with what Waldorf proposes, because I do believe they have a very good understanding of development and interest of the children. So, I do need a base…I do need something structured.

When she began homeschooling Isabel used Waldorf as a frame for their curriculum, but she didn’t stick closely to it because she believes it was “very strict” and she doesn’t like that.

It was really hard to keep the kids interested in the themes and activities of that curriculum. And it was really hard for me to keep up with my own skills and professional-development necessary to be true to that curriculum.

Their schooling is very informal. She is a mom who includes what she thinks is important, but then modifies things according to her children’s interests. She describes their curriculum as,

Very, very informal. I still kind of keep the direction of it. They work on things they really enjoy, and we do kind of projects on topics of interest.

 Isabel doesn’t have money to do all the things she would like to do with her children. So, she encourages them to be independent and creative and participate in making and saving money for field trips they want to take.

So, they do everything around that. For example, it could be an animal they want to study…or it could be like the lanyard, they wanted to make money to go to the museum and we have not money…and I say well, if you wanna go to the museum you have to find a way to make money. And that’s when we work on brainstorming how we can do that.

Isabel doesn’t buy structured curricula. However, her children have used Khan Academy for math for the last three years, Matias started introduction to chemistry at Khan Academy, and Isabel always has her eye out for materials that might be interesting and useful.

J: Where do you get your materials and stuff?
I: We don’t. I mean I’m going to get a book for Luciana for math because I saw it and I really liked it. I mean it’s the life of Fred.

J: That’s a math book?

I: That’s a math book and I looked through it and I went ummm, because she needs more than I can, like she needs structure. Now for me this is a time when she needs to start learning specific things, even if they don’t come her way.

J: But you don’t want to get a math textbook?

I: No

 As Isabel’s daughter, Luciana, approaches high school, Isabel wants her to have a more structured approach to learning so that she can be successful in high school.

We are looking for a school for Luciana for next year (10th grade) because we feel that she needs a more structured schooling to be prepared to apply and attend college.

 Families that don’t use structured curriculum often become concerned as their children approach high school age and contemplate attending a brick and mortar high school.

 

photo credit: OakleyOriginals Maryland Relatives via photopin (license)

Meghan’s Curriculum

Traditional school learning is very driven by curriculum. I taught 4th grade for eleven years and curriculum played a critical role in organizing and directing learning. So, in alternative educational situations, what role does curriculum play?

 J: Do you have a bought curriculum you use?

M: I don’t.

While Meghan says she doesn’t have a bought curriculum, meaning an overarching curriculum that dictates learning in all subjects, she does rely on a great variety of textbooks, reading programs, and classes both online and live. Among the homeschooling families I interviewed the role played by curriculum stretches from absolutely no curriculum at all to using a bought curriculum complete with texts, teacher manuals, CDs, lessons, assignments, grades etc.

The way Meghan organizes and directs the learning of her children is typical of many families in my study. Meghan uses a parent-built approach putting in what is important to parents, but able to be very flexible, creating individualized approaches for each child, depending on what they want and need.

Obviously, we set what they’re going to be learning and which years and whatever…

We kind of vary. I switch it up, year to year, based upon the kid and what I think that they would really be interested in learning.

 My fourth and second graders are doing science together. My older ones take advantage of some online classes…once a week a live class, and then they have their assignments the rest of the week.

In math, Meghan has found a program she likes,

I’ve done that the first seven years, and every year all I have to do is buy new math workbooks. But I have the teacher books, and I have the DVDs.

 In writing, however, they don’t use any curriculum. Writing is really her husband’s bailiwick and he is in charge and is very creative in his approach,

He’s a very outside the box thinker. His strength is writing. He loves writing so he just comes up with these off the wall projects…and he’ll incorporate history into them and you know all kinds of stuff…he’ll just tell them now this is the scope, and he’ll just go through several lessons of sitting down with them and going through it…in the end it’s amazing.

Meghan and her husband believe that communication is key in life, both speech and writing.

Speaking, writing, those are key in life. They open gateways. They open doors. They speak volumes.

They have used Landry Academy as a resource. It offers online courses at very reasonable prices, and Greg, their oldest, became very interested in the debate club opportunities. Public speaking is critical to communication and their children have been involved in a homeschool group where they give speeches.

While many parents don’t have the background and training of traditional teachers, they do have the benefit of a very small class size, knowing their ‘students’ very intimately, and being able to be as flexible as they need to. One example of their flexibility was when their second child seemed to be struggling. Academics came easily to their oldest child, but they sensed problems with their second child.

M: I mean the subjects have to get covered. But if we sense we’re losing like Gary last year. He’s very different from Greg, he’s a struggling learner. Somehow, he doesn’t process the way the average person processes information. So, his seventh-grade year we had to step back. Bruce told me, I sense problems here.  Gary didn’t have a free year, he had a repeating kind of year, where we just went over the same math concepts. Bruce worked with him on writing structure a bit more. He wrote essays on topics he liked. In history we made sure he chose something he really liked.

 J: And did that work for him?

 M: Yeah, oh yeah!!.  And he came back this year…he was just like a different person.

Bruce and Meghan felt like it was an answer to prayer.

Bruce and Meghan have many children and they have had a lot of practice planning what will happen each year in their homeschool. All their children have been homeschooled from beginning to end. In another post I will discuss their ideas of success and how their children have fared with this approach.

 

 

Photo by Thomas Young on Unsplash

Janna’s curriculum

Curriculum plays a varied and interesting role in Janna’s homeschooling story. When Janna began homeschooling her girls, she immediately purchased a structured online curriculum, Time for Learning.

It’s an online curriculum, but it’s private pay. It’s not through a Cyber School or anything like that. We did that the first year because I was worried about keeping track of everything too…It’s a full curriculum.

 I wanted something we could just use out of box, ‘out of computer’ [laughter]… I wasn’t really sure where Sacha was in terms of, I feel like she maybe wasn’t exactly at second grade, like maybe there were things that she needed to catch up on and also some things that maybe she was above…Their [Time for Learning] bill is that the curriculum adjusts for where you are. So, if you’re doing something on the computer and you’re making a lot of mistakes, then it will just automatically back you up.

Here she comments on the preponderance of religious curriculums.

The thing I liked about it, well it’s secular, which is a big thing for us; we are not homeschooling because of religious reasons, and we’re not a religious family. So that eliminates a bunch of homeschooling curriculum…We weeded out a lot, because I didn’t want to, I mean I know some people will just skip those parts or whatever, but I just didn’t want to be picking and choosing.

While Janna and her daughters loved the program, as the school year progressed their use of the program slowly diminished. They began doing their own writing and reading and math and didn’t need the curriculum. Their learning became more organic.

We loved it (online curriculum). We really did. The kids loved it. I loved it. It keeps track of everything for you and tells you exactly what they have done and haven’t done and so it’s like easy-peasy at the end of the year. And we probably would have continued with it, there wasn’t anything really negative about it. But I just decided that we, I, didn’t really need that anymore. We were using it less and less because we were doing other stuff more. We were doing more writing on our own. We were doing more reading on our own. We were doing more math stuff on our own, and I just decided I didn’t need it any more.

 Actually, we were talking this year about going back to it just for the math component, cause the kids really liked the math component on it, but it’s expensive to pay for the whole thing just to do math.

 So, yeah, it was really more that, that I just decided I wanted to be more interactive with them. And I was more comfortable, like I wasn’t as worried about the rubric anymore, about checking the boxes and I think I settled down and got more comfortable.

 Janna became less reliant on someone else telling her what her kids needed to learn and also, she wanted to be more personally involved in the homeschooling experience. However, she did target certain skills and subjects they were interested in and accessed or purchased certain programs, like Brave Writer for language arts and writing.

Love it (Brave Writer). It can be online, or it can be boxed. I just boxed it. I love it. I’m the kind, you know, I wrote a lot in school. I read a lot. I’m all about the reading and writing. And I just love the whole thing, and I really wanted us to do it because the spine of it is sharing books together and then doing some like copy work and short writing on the books. I just really loved the framework.

 I realized that nobody was going to come and tell me that my kids weren’t learning enough. After I got over kind of all of that, I realized that that’s like the beauty of all of this. And that’s like why we keep homeschooling is that it’s super fun. I mean I get to do all this cool stuff. Like history, I never was a history person really. I never really got a good grasp of it…Read all this stuff, learn all this stuff, all is fitting together in a way it didn’t fit together for me before.

The second year of homeschooling began.

At the beginning of the year… we did kind of what we’ve always done. Which is we do a little bit of everything. We do some book work, umm more math, writing, book work. They both had their classes that they took. Ruby is my science kid, so she took Franklin classes, Wagner institute classes. She does a science nature class at Aubrey down the road. That’s why we come here. And Sacha was doing art and that kind of stuff.

 Then Janna was diagnosed with breast cancer. She had surgery and was often sick from the treatment. What to do with the children? Janna’s father suggested that the girls go back to school because Janna was often unable to help them. Janna wanted to have them close by and they wanted to be with their mother.

In the spring I worried more about them having something. Not because I was worried about them academically. I always feel like you can catch up with that stuff. But I wanted them to have something that they could do in the house when I wasn’t feeling well. So, I signed them both up for Time for Learning (Online curriculum they used when they first started homeschooling.)

We used bits and pieces when they are wanting to do something and I’m not available. But for the spring it was really useful because that’s exactly what it is, especially for Ruby, she really had times when she needed … to have structure, wanting to learn things. I wasn’t as available, and it really was useful for us…so I’d get annoyed with why am I paying thirty bucks?!? But that’s how it changed in the spring. We definitely relied on it more. They used it more, and I think they did get a lot out of it.

Janna also used Khan Academy; it was a good fit for Ruby and it was free. Ruby was particularly interested in computer science and coding. She taught herself JavaScript through Khan Academy. Janna explained, “I mean I’m involved. I know that she’s doing it, but she knows more than I do at this point.”

Having her kids learn at home captured Janna’s imagination and pull her into a new way of life. She thrived on new ideas and wanted to be involved in family learning.

One of my homeschooling friends talks about strewing materials, and strewing ideas, and I just love it, like it gives me this little mental image, and I just love that idea…throw a bunch of stuff around, see what we love, what we don’t like, what’s interesting. What works? What doesn’t work? Oh, we tried to learn some math this way. That didn’t really work. Let’s try to learn something this way. I don’t know? But I just love that idea, like this whole different curriculum.

Once Janna was recovered from her cancer and life seemed to settle a little, Sacha learned about a new opportunity – a brick and mortar fine arts academy that combined with doing regular schooling through Cyber School. She quickly prepared an audition at the end of the summer and was accepted. Now life involved taking Sacha ‘to school’ two days a week, and then Sacha labored through Cyber School three days a week while Janna and Ruby carried on with their own particular brand of homeschooling. Sacha loved the fine arts brick and mortar classes.

There’s a theme for the year, they do all things art around that theme. Last year it was Women and Arts. So, they did dance, they did music, they did history, they did live performances, they did all kinds of stuff, awesome.

The Cyber School was very trying. Sacha found it to be very challenging and time-consuming. Even though they only did it for three days they were expected to complete five-days-worth of classes. The question of whether Sacha would continue in the program became moot because the family decided to move to New York because of dad’s job.

The family was challenged to build up their knowledge of a whole new state and environment in which to homeschool. The only curriculum reported to me after the move was that they use something called Build Your Library.

We’re using that as a kind of the frame, so I am changing some things. It purports itself to be an everything but math curriculum. It integrates history, literature, reading, writing, and history, and science. It integrates them together… It’s a five day a week curriculum to get through a year. And we don’t do curriculum five days a week, so I cut and paste.

I look forward to hearing from Janna each year. What new approach will they be trying this year?

Photo by Ben White on Unsplash

How Important is Curriculum?

Morgan talks about curriculum, history curriculum in particular;

“You know when we grew up we learned white people history, mostly wars…”

“…out of a text book, and it was very Western culture-centered, and history was mostly about who fought, who won, and…

When Morgan said this I thought… The Trojan War, the Wars in the Bible, the Persian Empire, the Roman Empire, the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World War 1, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War. She’s right, at least that’s what I studied in school, at least in middle school and high school. It never occurred to me that the history of the world didn’t have to be followed in threads of fighting.

Morgan suggests other ways history could be organized,

Why do we learn history by wars? How about we learn history based on science and invention, or from a women’s point of view or from you know indigenous people’s point of view or there are so many more things which in some ways makes, like I don’t feel like I had a well-rounded education because it was from such a narrow point of view.

And outside of history,  curriculum-guided content still dominates what a child learns in school. When I chose to homeschool my children, I searched out the local public schools for their grade-level curricula to make sure my children learned the “important stuff”; I so bought into the absolute sovereignty of the curriculum the public schools had created. Morgan had the courage to imagine something different.

“Like it doesn’t seem to me, in this day and age, that there is a particular curriculum that you need to know.”

Morgan unschools her children. She doesn’t follow a curriculum. When asked what goals she has for her children she responded,

I think my goals are for them to be confident that they can figure out stuff. Like I don’t think you need to know this or you need to know that so much as more the confidence that they know how to figure things out or know people to go ask or can go online and figure stuff out. Like it doesn’t seem to me, in this day and age, that there is a particular curriculum that you need to know as much as the ability to learn what you need to know.

Morgan’s personal school experience made a strong impression on her and the direction she steers her children.

I feel like when I grew up you had to know Western Civilization and bloddy blah, and that a lot of the rest of the world history was just kind of ignored. And it’s like well there’s more if you tried to learn all the world history from forever, you could never know it all, and it would take up all your time. So I think everyone’s view of everything is so much broader, that you can’t say you have to know this.

I’ve read some of the classics when I was in school, and there is other stuff that I haven’t read. and I don’t feel my life is ruined by the classics I missed and history I don’t know.

Morgan reports feeling bored or angry when she went to school. She felt unable to do the things she was interested in.

Well, I was super bored through all of school. and I was angry a lot of the time…I joked about Cuisenaire rods, because I loved to play with Cuisenaire rods, and I remember they were really something that got brought out for like two or three days in the school year. And I REALLY loved them. I really wanted to play with them and make patterns and do stuff, and we weren’t allowed to. Like they only came out at that one time. That’s just one example, but there were a lot of things that just made me angry…having to do what they thought was important, the way they wanted to do, and being bored just a lot of the time. I was smart. I got my work done really fast…and I wasn’t allowed to do what I was interested in.

These experiences in traditional classrooms led Morgan to try something different. When asked about how she plans school, without a curriculum, she laughs and says,

I would say we have a lot of books in our house. and we have the computer. And I do go through and sort of look at, like Ricky will be in third grade this year, and I do go through and look at what’s expected of a third grader, and I will get books out of the library…The other thing that I do, was like we went to the mountains and there were like 50 million garter snakes everywhere. Ricky was capturing them. We were there when they came out of their den this spring and had the mating ball…when we came home from the mountains, we went to the library and got all these books out about garter snakes, and Ricky looks at the pictures and we talk about it, and I read them and tell them about it. Like sometimes they’ll read them and get interested, and we watch videos, but that’s sort of my planning is sort of when something gets interesting, we get a whole bunch of books.

Going against the tide has not been worry free. Math is one example; her boys haven’t studied math in a structured way. Some of this causes her worry. She’s not sure that her choices are always the right ones, but she does the best she can. She talks about the math she learned in school,

M: Like the times tables, Any times tables (Morgan snaps her fingers a few times) pops out of my head, you know?

J: you mean you can’t remember the?

M: No, I know them all. Oh, they were drilled into my head. 6×7=42, you know like, it’s just there. And they will never (pause)

J; have that?

M: have that. That immediate knowledge of 8×5=40. and I can’t tell whether that’s a problem or not.

I spent a lot of math time teaching math facts to fourth graders. When they didn’t learn them I heard about it from the teachers in the upper grades; it caused problems in higher level math. It remains to be see how difficult this will be for Morgan’s children. Maybe they won’t ever use higher level math, or else use calculators. Maybe one day they’ll decide they need to know this and learn it.

Curriculum holds a place in our culture that few people question. I’ll share how some other parents in my study approached curriculum.

 

photo credit: Bundesheer.Fotos via photopin (license)

The Culture of Schooling

You, yes you, when you graduated from high school, were more prepared to major in education than most other majors. This is because you already have 12 years of experience with education under your belt. You’ve been immersed in the culture of schooling for your whole life.

Smagorinsky (2011) presents an elegant explanation as to why teachers continue to employ traditional, teacher-centered, lecture-driven instruction when research recommends more progressive, constructivist, student-centered, experiential pedagogies. He argues, “that the issue of the persistence of authoritarian patterns of teaching and learning is a function of the culture of schooling, a culture embedded in 4000 years of stone and seemingly impervious to real, systemic change” (Smagorinsky, 2011, p. 78).

Here is a brief accounting of Smagorinksy’s thinking about why education is slow to change. (For the full argument read the chapter on The Culture of Schooling in his book.)

…the deep processing of students’ conception of schooling is established early and thus powerfully (Craik & Lockhart, 1972) 83

 A teacher starts learning to be one when they first enter school as a child.

 I approach this problem by going through the process through which people, particularly teachers, become acculturated to authoritarian schooling and questioning the degree to which even the most passionately progressive teacher education program can produce fundamental changes in teacher candidates’ thinking as they transition from their generally authoritarian school and university experiences as students to their brief exposure to alternatives in teacher education courses. From this course work they immediately cycle back, often concurrent with their university preparation in progressive teaching into the very settings that for so long socialized them to authoritarian conceptions of teaching and learning. 80

 It can be very hard to impose newer, progressive ideas of teaching over well-known, often loved ways of teaching.

 Faculties, then, tend to reproduce themselves by hiring people who will perpetuate their values; and the pool from which they draw their candidates is filled with people who are inclined to oblige. 94

 The result for the workforce is a profession more likely to be filled by those who embrace authoritarian traditions than those who seek alternatives. 95

It is hard for new ideas to displace cultural norms. A person has a hard time even waking up to understanding the culture they were raised in; it is so powerful in molding who they’ve become. There’s a very strong desire to hold on to what you know, to stay on the path. This is one reason I’m drawn to alternative ways of educating, rather than trying to change the traditional school.

photo credit: acase1968 Graduate via photopin (license)

Homeschooling with Kindles

Mollie is a homeschooling mom in my study. Technology opened up a whole new relationship between Mollie’s children and their grandfather. Their grandfather was a pastor with a disability, ataxia. Mollie explains,

He doesn’t walk well or speak well, but he’s losing different, many abilities and so I was trying to think of ways to connect with him better. He can’t talk on the phone anymore, he lives in Georgia… we see him like twice a year. And I just felt like… even when we’re together it’s hard to talk because he physically can’t speak well.

Mollie’s father discovered Kindles. He could still type and so he got very excited discovering the things he could do with Kindles and he made sure that everyone in the family had one. Mollie was looking for ways for her children to interact with their grandfather so she asked his assistance in planning their Bible class for that year. The rest is history…

He got really excited and he started saying oh he had ideas and he was going to use this curriculum and all that. So, he sends every week on Wednesday, he sends them their assignment for the week, and for my son they are doing a video course and there’s a workbook that goes with it, so you watch a DVD and he takes the notes that his grandfather made up for him.

Collaborating on this project opened other lines of communication for the family and their grandfather. Mollie gets a little emotional when she talks about this. She says,

I just haven’t been able to talk to him very much and now we’re emailing a lot more. And my daughter…so every time she gets her email…she’s better at this because she gets her work done faster, so she has more spare time. But uh she’ll get an email from him with the assignment, and then I got her to try to write back to him. So, she writes back, and she’ll write and tell him whatever she’s doing during the week, just to keep it going. So that’s been great. And I’ve just been emailing him more because I’m paying attention.

I love hearing this story because the older people in my life would love more communication with their young relatives and for this grandfather to have found it using technology is a hopeful sign of what technology might be used for.

The Demise of the Nation State

NOTE: My intention for this blog was not to be highly political. However I believe this article provides background to the idea that schooling is suffering and needs to change to meet the needs of the changing world.

On Facebook, today, I read The Demise of the Nation State, published by The Guardian. I had recently come to a personal acceptance that the populist or nationalistic state of our current country is in sync with the state of many other countries and felt very alarmed. This article was long, and mentally taxing at times, but it woke me up to how I accept nation states as a way of life, a way of being. Contemplating the idea that nation states have a lifetime, that death may be part of their journey was alarming. However, this article’s claims seem plausible.

 

If one studies the history of education, one learns quickly that the purpose of most schools has been indoctrination: mainly of ‘country values’ (political), economic needs, or religious ideas. If nation states are failing, then educational institutions, tasked with creating citizens for that nation state, will become obsolete. (I was going to say quickly, but educational institutions never do things quickly.)

 

I am a strong proponent of alternative education. However, I also believe that traditional schooling has played an important role in our nation state. I am deeply interested in exploring ways that traditional educational institutions could be more flexible, change with the times and meet the needs of their growing population. But I can’t say I have any good ideas at present. I fear if I had children to educate today I’d flee to homeschooling or some form of alternative education.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/apr/05/demise-of-the-nation-state-rana-dasgupta

Off the Beaten Path

Families that choose a different path for schooling often find that family and friends don’t understand. Janna, a homeschooling mom, coined the phrase “off the beaten path’ when trying to explain their choice.

I mean they just don’t really understand why I would choose, why anybody, but why us in particular, would choose to go this far off the beaten path kind of thing.

She carries the metaphor even further:

…that’s why I keep telling my parents… if anything, it has shown, it’s proven to me and Mark, but also to the kids, that there is no one way. And not only is there not only one way, but there’s not only one way for you.

I feel like homeschooling…we’re already on a different path. I feel like…any other different path you take is cool. I mean homeschooling is a different path for a lot of people; they see it as a really odd path, but it works. I think it works. It works for us. I think it works for a lot of people. I think it could work for more people than people think they could.

I pulled my son off the beaten track in fourth grade, onto a new path of homeschooling. At the time I was unsure how our schooling would play out. I thought even if he just read for a year he’d be okay. He reported to me later that it occurred to him, if we can approach school in such a different way, we can probably approach other things in life differently than the traditional way.

There is no one way to learn, more people can probably manage it than think they can, and it may open up new pathways to thinking and acting in many different arenas.

 

 

 

Technology

If you want to draw a response of uncertainty, frustration, and irritation, just ask a parent how much screen time they let their children have. I believe that digital technology evokes very strong feelings in parents: feelings that somehow technology is threatening their children’s well-being.

Teachers react similarly when asked that question about their students. However, schools have certain barriers to technology use: cost, training, maintenance, expertise, traditional instruction and curriculum that doesn’t usually include substantial amounts of digital technology. Curriculum and instruction evolve slowly. Classes are generally age-defined so kids aren’t learning from older students. Change is much slower in schools.

I argue that technology has already impacted traditional schools in a big way and they are struggling to handle it. One area impacted by technology is content, or fact-gathering. Traditional curriculum and instruction generally included teaching information, facts about the Civil War for example. Kids may not need that anymore. They are usually quite capable of finding lots of fascinating information, maps, pictures, videos about the Civil War. Teachers still play an important role in enhancing and directing their learning, but acceptance of the fact that technology has replaced part of their job will become harder and harder to ignore.